← All modules
Module 45 min read

The KPIs That Decide

The calculation chain from share price to valuation, the metrics that separate a good business from a cheap one, and why companies become overvalued.

In summary
  1. 01Company size is market capitalisation, never share price. Enterprise value adjusts it for debt and cash.
  2. 02A price-to-earnings ratio is meaningless alone; it acquires meaning next to a growth rate.
  3. 03A high multiple is a promise the market has already paid for. If growth merely slows, the share falls hard.

The calculation chain

4.1Share price tells you nothing on its own

A €4 share is not cheaper than a €400 one — it is a smaller slice. How many slices exist is arbitrary. Company size is market capitalisation: share price multiplied by shares outstanding.

4.2Enterprise value adjusts for the balance sheet

Market cap prices the equity. Enterprise value prices the whole business: market cap, plus debt, less cash — what an acquirer would actually pay, because they inherit the debt and receive the cash. Two companies with identical market caps are not equally priced if one carries €5bn of debt.

Exhibit 1The chain, worked end to end
StepFormulaWorked example
Market capitalisationPrice × shares outstanding€50 × 400m = €20bn
Enterprise valueMarket cap + debt − cash€20bn + €4bn − €1bn = €23bn
Earnings per shareNet income ÷ shares outstanding€1,000m ÷ 400m = €2.50
Price-to-earningsPrice ÷ earnings per share€50 ÷ €2.50 = 20
Net marginNet income ÷ revenue€1,000m ÷ €8,000m = 12.5%
Note: Read the P/E as years: at 20, you are paying twenty years of current profit for one share. That framing makes a P/E of 60 feel as demanding as it actually is.
Note

When P/E shows "N/A" the company has no profits, so there is nothing to divide by. That is not automatically bad — many young companies are deliberately unprofitable while they grow — but this particular metric cannot help you, and the business has to be judged another way.

What this means for you

Never compare share prices between companies. Compare market caps for size, enterprise value when debt is significant, and P/E only against companies in the same sector.

Check yourself
Company A trades at €4 with 500m shares. Company B trades at €200 with 5m shares. Which is larger, and by how much?

Is it too expensive?

4.3Price only means something next to growth

A P/E of 40 sounds expensive and 10 sounds cheap. Both readings are worthless without knowing which way the profits underneath are moving. Dividing the P/E by the growth rate gives the PEG ratio: roughly 1 suggests price and growth are in balance, well above suggests optimism is doing the work.

Exhibit 2Two companies, same sector
Company ACompany B
Price-to-earnings4010
Annual profit growth+35%−5%
PEG ratio1.1Not meaningful (negative growth)
Implied P/E in 3 years, price unchanged~16Higher than today
Reads asDemanding but defensibleCheap, and getting cheaper for a reason
Note: You are never buying this year’s earnings; you are buying the whole future stream. Price has to be judged against the direction of that stream, not its current level.

Run it yourself. Hold the price still and drag the growth rate: the same multiple travels from "expectation is doing the work" to "cheap, if the growth is real" without the share price moving at all.

P/E
31.3
PEG
1.74
Earnings yield
3.2%
Years to 15×
4.4
Priced for success. The growth has to arrive more or less as forecast; a slowdown alone would reprice this even with the business intact.

At 18% a year, earnings need 4.4 years to grow into a 15× multiple at today’s price. Everything you make beyond that depends on the growth continuing past the point you have already paid for.

4.4Why companies become overvalued

A high multiple is not a mistake — it is a promise the market has already paid for. The risk is asymmetric: if growth merely slows, without reversing, a richly valued share can fall 40% while the business remains perfectly healthy. The company did not fail; the expectation did.

4.5The value trap

When a share looks strikingly cheap against its peers, the first assumption should not be that you have spotted something thousands of professionals missed. It should be that the market is pricing something you have not looked for yet.

Exhibit 3Genuinely cheap, or a value trap
CheckGenuinely cheapValue trap
RevenueFlat or growingFalling for several years
MarginsStableCompressing year after year
DebtSteady or reducingRising while profits fall
IndustryCyclical downturnStructural decline
The reasonTemporary and identifiablePermanent, and the market knows
Note: If every column checks out and the share is still cheap, you may genuinely have found something. It happens — considerably less often than a screen full of low P/Es suggests.

The table is the theory. Applying it to a set of figures under mild time pressure is the skill, and it is worth practising before real money depends on it — five cases below, each a constructed composite rather than a real company.

1 of 50 right
Property — officesTrading at 60% of stated book value.
Occupancy91% → 74%
Leases expiring within 2 yrs38% of income
Debt maturing next year€1.2bn
Rate on that debt2.1% → ~6.5% to refinance
What this means for you

Judge price against growth, against the sector, and against the company’s own history. Then write down what would have to be true for the valuation to make sense — if you cannot state it in a sentence, you do not have a thesis.

Check yourself
A retailer trades on a P/E of 6 while its competitors average 15. Revenue has fallen three years running and debt is rising. What is the most likely explanation?
Apply it

Open any card on Stock Analysis. Market cap, P/E, revenue growth and net margin across the top are now four numbers you can read and challenge rather than skip.

Stock Analysis